# Contact Peptide GHK-Cu

> Contact Peptide GHK-Cu: Corrections to the GHK-Cu Record — Write to Peptide GHK-Cu about the GHK-Cu literature on this site — citation corrections, missed studies, framing. No clinic behind the panel, no dosing guidance, nothing for sale.

**CONTACT // CORRECTIONS**

Citation corrections, missed studies, and framing complaints. Those are the three things this desk is for.

## What this desk is for

Three kinds of message get a useful answer here: a citation that is wrong, a GHK-Cu study that belongs on the panel and is missing, and a finding that has been framed more strongly or more weakly than its source supports. A well-sourced correction is the single most valuable thing anyone sends, and it gets acted on rather than filed.

The fourth kind is the preprint question, and it is welcome too. If either of the two 2023 rodent neuroprotection preprints reaches peer-reviewed publication, or if an unaffiliated group replicates them, that changes what this site should say, and a pointer to it would be genuinely useful.

## What this desk cannot do

It cannot tell anyone what to take, how much, how often, or by what route. There is no dose to give: GHK-Cu has no approved indication anywhere, no validated human pharmacokinetics, and no protocol this record could support. A request for one will get this paragraph back.

It cannot diagnose anything, interpret a symptom, review a routine, or advise on whether a compound suits a particular person. There is no clinician on this side of the panel and no clinic behind it. Questions of that kind belong with a qualified healthcare professional who can weigh individual circumstances, which this site structurally cannot.

It cannot source, price, stock, ship or point toward any product or supplier, because it does none of those things and has no relationship with anyone who does. Messages asking where to obtain something will not be answered, in either direction.

## What to include

For a correction: name the page, quote the sentence as it stands, and give the identifier — PubMed ID or DOI — of the paper that contradicts or corrects it. That combination is enough to check and fix in one pass.

For a suggested study: a PubMed or PMC link is ideal. Peer-reviewed primary research, systematic reviews and authoritative monographs are what this panel is built from. Preprints are read and can be added, but they are marked as preprints on the page, without exception.

Use the fields below to send a name, an email address, a subject and the message itself. There is no account to create, nothing to sign up for and nothing to buy. Frequently asked material is already answered at [is copper peptide safe](/faq).

---

A readout panel over the GHK-Cu literature: every figure pinned to the study that measured it, every preprint marked as one, and nothing here dosed, diagnosed, prescribed or sold.